![]() ![]() No such restriction exists on macOS, where third-party browsers can use whatever rendering engine they please.Īpple could still conceivably impose limitations on the way these browsers work-the amount of storage they're allowed to use for caching content, how much memory and CPU capacity they're permitted to use while running in the background, how aggressively tabs must be unloaded from RAM to make room for other apps, what extensions they're allowed to use, and plenty of other possibilities. The iOS versions of Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and others can currently sync with their desktop counterparts and present whatever user interface they want, but the WebKit requirement means their capabilities and shortcomings are mostly the same as Safari's. Regulatory pressure from multiple governments is pushing Apple in the direction of loosening many of its App Store restrictions, including (begrudgingly) accepting third-party payment services and sideloading of apps and third-party app stores. The correlated activity from Google and Mozilla could suggest that they're expecting Apple to drop its restrictions on third-party browser engines in the near future, or the companies could simply be hedging their bets. Further Reading Report: Apple plans to support sideloading and third-party app stores by 2024Īpple hasn't announced any rule changes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |